[SDR] when to meet --- Re: NO MEETING TONIGHT

[grlind at rockwellcollins.com]

option "A"   1x weekly for 2 hours --- I think we need about 2 hours to 
hash things out.. we can cut back time and frequency as we get going... 

I would like to suggest Tuesdays but based on current attendance it is not 
working - I think Thursday would be a good second in my case.

Preference:
1. A
2. B
3. C

Just a note we have a Linux Distro of Ubunto on a BeagelBoard  running 
FLDIGI.  We have a Softrock hopefully have it receive  HF this week. 
Cameron had to play around with sound mixer and audio settings to make 
this work... It  is decoding a recorded wave file of a PSK31 QSO. 

Gregg




Barry Buelow <barry.buelow at gmail.com> 
Sent by: sdr-bounces+grlind=rockwellcollins.com at rf.org
05/10/2011 12:37 PM

To
sdr at rf.org
cc

Subject
[SDR] NO MEETING TONIGHT






 
Folks,
 
The regular Tuesday night meeting isn't drawing a crowd.  I thought this 
was a convenient time when the weather was bad/poor.  The CLC conflict 
didn't help attendance either.  Now that summer has finally arrived, 
everyone will want to be out the door in a hurry.
 
While I'd prefer the pace of a weekly meeting, at least until some key 
technical decisions are made, I'm not sure there is sufficient interest to 
continue.
 
I propose the following meeting options:
 
A.  Continue weekly 5pm meeting (something other than Tuesday)  If you 
vote for this, select a preferred day of the week.
 
B.  Every _other_ week, 5pm, suggest a weekday
 
C.  Monthly, 7-9pm.  Day tbd
 
D.  Lunch hour meeting.  This is difficult as some folks will have to 
drive.  If we rotate location, people loose track.  Maybe we could do 
Netmeeting.
 
Please reply with 2 or 3 preferences in order of preference:
1.  (most desired)
2.
3.
 
I know there continue to be informal hallway discussions, while these are 
good, they aren't getting widespread visbility.  Also, many rehash "good 
ideas" with NO supporting analyses.  This doesn't count as progress.  
 
We need to achieve critical mass soon, or CARC SDR is just going to fade 
away (and I'll blame it on D*)
 
Barry
 
 
 
 
 
 
 _______________________________________________
Sdr mailing list
Sdr at rf.org
https://rf.org/mailman/listinfo/sdr

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://rf.org/pipermail/sdr/attachments/20110510/0219416b/attachment.html>