[Lf] [Fwd: LF: RE: VS: Feeding an inverted L-antenna]
Andre Kesteloot
andre.kesteloot at verizon.net
Mon Nov 4 10:00:49 CST 2002
Andy talbot wrote:
> Beacause the optimum lowest loss matching network is always the one with the
> lowest possible Q. And the lowest possible Q is given by an L match. Here the
> L match is formed by the series inductance which has the dual job of cancelling
> out most of the capacitive reactance. One this is done whatever real part of
> the impedance has to be matched, which can be done with a little bit more L
> followed by a shunt C to give a required impedance - or more aften as is done
> on these bands the transmitter is then matched into whatever residual impedance
> is presented. Due to the dominance of the ground resistance, this often turns
> out to be some useable value in the 20 - 100 ohm range.
>
> Any other components added over those required to make a basic match are likely
> to add extra loss. The one exception to this general rule is where extra
> components are added in order to deliberately broadband match a load impedance.
> The mathemateically correct procedure for this is probably to start off with
> something like a chebshev network (as in the filters) and go from there - but
> these days designers just plug the requirements into a circuit optimiser and
> press the go button - then trust the results. Broadband matching something
> that is inherently very narrow band such as an LF antenna is not possible, or
> at least not without incurring considerable losses away from resonance.
>
> Andy G4JNT
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jan-martin.noding at telenor.com [SMTP:jan-martin.noding at telenor.com]
> Sent: 2002/11/04 12:50
> To: rsgb_lf_group at blacksheep.org
> Subject: LF: VS: Feeding an inverted L-antenna
>
> Wonder why seems to be a habit use a series coil to tune out the capacitance of
> the 136kHz aerial, instead of more normal sort of matching - using T- or
> L-network
>
> Below is shown some impedance for a thought antenna (had to enter some radial
> length for the program to work) using ENDFEED.exe provided by G4FGQ
>
> H. Height, metres .. 10.0 N. Number of buried radial wires . 2
> L. Length, metres .. 150.0 R. Length of radials, metres ..... 50.0
> W. Wire dia, mm .... 2.00 D. Diameter of radial wires, mm .. 1.0
> F. Frequency Kilo-Hz 136 S. Strap length to radials, metres 3.0
> G. Ground characteristics:- Average soil: R = 100, K = 12
> H+L+S = 0.074 wavelengths.
> R ohms jX ohms Tune out jX with
> FEEDPOINT INPUT IMPEDANCE: 18.9 -1096.1 1282.7 micro-Henrys
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> <-- Transcvr Shunt L Antenna -->
> T-NETWORK L & C values: 142 pF 3666.6 uH 295 pF
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> <-- Transcvr Series X Antenna -->
> L-NETWORK L & C values: 2086.4 uH 3328.4 uH
> Alternative L & C values: 656 pF 794.7 uH
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> LOSS in T-match coil 25.4 % of Tx Pwr GROUND ELECTRODE SYSTEM, INPUT Z
> in antenna conductor 3.3 % .. .. .. DC Resistance 2.9 ohms
> in soil in vicinity 42.6 % .. .. .. RF Resistance 7.2 ..
> in system of radials 28.6 % .. .. .. RF Reactance 7.0 ..
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Overall power radiating efficiency .. 0.05 percent
> Overall loss relative to ideal system 33.1 decibels or 5.5 'S-points'
>
> Select H,L,W,F,N,R,D,S,G to change data, B(egin again) or Q(uit program)
>
> you find the program on the link below
> >========================
> >Free Radio Design Software
> >Go to http://www.g4fgq.com
> >========================
> 73,
> Jan_Martin
> LA8AK (in JO38XC
> http://www.laud.no/la6nca/la8ak/
> NOTE: Because of heavy spamming now applying eremove.exe, please avoid odd
> titles!
> << File: ATT00000.htm >>
More information about the lf
mailing list