[Lf] LF allocation]

[Andre Kesteloot]

John Sexton wrote:
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> The following stations are allocated to this range of frequencies:
> 
> 171     Russian transmitter at Kaliningrad 1.2MW well received here
> 171     Lvov, Ukraine. 1MW (not heard)
> 171     Osipovicy, Bielo Russia. 1MW (not heard)
> 171     Moscow, Russia. 500kW (not heard)
> 171     Nador, Morocco. 1.2kW (not heard)
> 171.875 TV Line Oscillator harmonic (heard)
> 177     "Deutschlandradio Berlin" Zehlendorf/Oranienburg (100kW 13E24/52N48) strong station here
> 180     Ankara, Turkey. 1.2MW   heard
> 183     Europe 1 (Saarlouis 2MW 06E41/49N17) very strong here
> 186     Iceland (not heard)
> 187.5   TV Line Oscillator harmonic (heard)
> 188.5   "RAI Due" Caltanisetta/sicily 10kW 14E04/37N30 heard
> 189     Iceland Broadcast (reported active)
> 189     Belogorsk, Russia. 1.2MW heard
> 
> In addition
> 162     TDF, Allouis (Radio France Inter) 2MW
> is a strong station in Europe.
> 
> The one to avoid is Europe 1, Saarlouis, which uses an enhanced mode of amplitude modulation with wide sidebands.
> 
> 73, John, G4CNN
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Vernall"<vernall at xtra.co.nz>
> To: rsgb_lf_group at blacksheep.org
> Date: Tue Jul 17 12:42:58 PDT 2001
> Subject: LF: Re: VK, ZL LF allocation
> 
> >Jim M0BMU,>
> >Thanks for the preliminary information on quieter parts of the 165 - 190 kHz
> >band.
> >
> >> Mike's request for info reminds me - A while ago, I tried listening
> >> around 184.4 kHz, where the recent "transpac" tests occured, but
> >> this frequency is full of very strong LF broadcast station
> >> sidebands, as is most of 165kHz - 190kHz. But there was a gap in
> >> the general din around 169 - 173kHz that might be worth trying for
> >> VK/ZL to Europe LF tests one day - do others have a quiet spot
> >> here too? Would it be any good for the VK/ZL stations?
> >
> >ZL stations are permitted to transmit anywhere within 165 - 190 kHz, and
> >what counts most is using frequencies that have minimum QRM at DX receiving
> >stations.  Several slots are needed to cope with a number of ZL and VK
> >participating stations, some of them having good frequency control and
> >others that drift a few Hz.
> >
> >The next scheduled "transpac" testing is 22 September.  If EU stations can
> >agree on what the quietest slots are in the 169 - 173 kHz region are, then
> >they can be checked for reception in the greater Pacific area as well, and
> >appropriate new frequencies selected.  I have been co-ordinating the test
> >schedule and will use feedback from EU receiving checks to discuss with ZL
> >and VK participants for picking optimum test frequencies for next time.
> >
> >73, Bob
> >
> >
> 
> ___________________________________________________
> GO.com Mail
> Get Your Free, Private E-mail at http://mail.go.com