[Lf] Re: FW: Transatlantic Challenge - progress?

[Andre' Kesteloot]

Yes, we (AMRAD) agree that we will include the suggestion re (7) below, as
presented by Mike Dennison
Andre' N4ICK
********************************
John W Gould wrote:

> Andre' / Hardy - Mike Dennison has made a good point about special licences
> that I agree we should include. Can you adjust your draft accoringly.
>
> Hardy - where are you with the German version of the draft.  To whom do
> people send their claims for the DARC part of the certificates?
>
> It would be nice to try and get this complete before 1 March so that Mike
> can get the announcement into the April edition - a year after Peter's
> untimely departure.
>
> 73 John
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Dennison [mailto:mike.dennison at rsgb.org.uk]
> Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2000 11:56
> To: g3wkl at btinternet.com
> Subject: Re: Transatlantic Challenge - progress?
>
> > Since the exchange of e-mail last week I haven't seen any more
> > developments.
> >
> Sorry, John, pressure of work! All looks OK to me - BUT the recent
> activity from 7S6SAJ has thrown up a problem. They were running
> 1kW ERP from a huge commercial antenna by special permission. I
> think we must exclude special power levels that are outside normal
> licence conditions.
>
> Suggest something like:
> 7. Contacts must be made under the normal licence conditions for
> the band. Contacts made under special high power permits are not
> valid.
>
> > Mike, what are your deadlines for publishing?  Are you content with the
> > text?
> >
> Depends on when you want to publish. Deadlines are roughly the
> first of the month prior to publication, ie 1 Feb for March.
>
> Mike