[Lf] Re: [Lowfer] Loran... Need 100Khz reference or WWVB

[George Lemaster]

One more article:

"Using Loran-C for Time and Frequency Calibration" by R.W. Burhans, July
1983 Radio-Electronics, page 63.

An updated design and more complete receiver, but similar idea to Burhan's
earlier article in 73 "If you want to know where you are" April, 1978.

George
WB5OYP

----- Original Message -----
From: Bob Roehrig <broehrig at admin.aurora.edu>
To: snet <paulc at snet.net>
Cc: <lowfer at qth.net>; <lofexp at egroups.com>; lf-amrad <lf at amrad.org>
Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2000 6:03 PM
Subject: [Lf] Re: [Lowfer] Loran... Need 100Khz reference or WWVB


>
>
>
> I would vote for WWVB, if you can receive it well enough. LORAN is no
> doubt stronger but the problem is the emission is pulsed. You would need
> to come up with a phase locked circuit very similar to the AFC
> control in a color TV set - one that only needs a small signal sample
> to stay in lock. AT least WWVB is a steady carrier.
>
>                     "Nostalgia is a thing of the past"
>     E-mail: broehrig at admin.aurora.edu or k9eui at arrl.net   73 de Bob, K9EUI
>             CIS: Data / Telecom   Aurora University, Aurora, IL
>                       630-844-4898  Fax 630-844-4222
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lf mailing list
> lf at amrad.org
> http://www.amrad.org/mailman/listinfo/lf
>