[CRAPRS] N0CXX-5

Ron Tonneson ron.tonneson at gmail.com
Wed Nov 21 16:54:23 CST 2012


That is fine with me.  I was just doing what Charlie asked me to. The 
EPROM that is in there will work just fine as a stand-alone digi without 
weather.

It has been quite a while since I have been in the 112 station.  I 
retired in 2000 and have been back a few times.  Is there an internet 
available there now that will work?

Ron

On 11/21/2012 16:47, djhuff at rockwellcollins.com wrote:
> Posting from the CRAPRS mailing list:
>
>
> One thing to keep in mind here, combining them all into 1 makes it 
> more difficult. (digi, igate, Wx station)
>
> We talked this year about the witch watch, and how we really need an 
> Igate up in the 112 shack.  The suggestion was to leave the Digipeater 
> 100% separate from everything else, and make a combination Igate and 
> weather station. Why are you working on combining them?
>
> Plus, if we keep the Digi separate, we can move it into the closet 
> farther down (where the DSTAR as originally going to be moved to), 
> which would give higher coverage on a better tower, and leave the 
> Igate/Wx station in 112.  A PC based Igate and weather station 
> separate also is much more configurable for alternate frequency nets.
>
> David J Huff
> CS Reliability, Maintainability, & Safety
> Rockwell Collins Inc.
> 319.295.8949
>
>
>
> From: David Peterson <peterson.davidc at gmail.com>
> To: Ron Tonneson <ron.tonneson at gmail.com>
> Cc: CRAPRS <craprs at rf.org>
> Date: 11/21/2012 04:23 PM
> Subject: Re: [CRAPRS] N0CXX-5
> Sent by: craprs-bounces+djhuff=rockwellcollins.com at rf.org
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Posting from the CRAPRS mailing list:Regarding your side note, I just 
> saw a few packets scroll by that were digipeated by K0HAM-9:
> Port(inet-text):2012-11-21T22:15:18.830 
> TEXT:KC9CDS-9>T1TQ7Q,K0HAM-9*,WIDE1*,K0HAM-10*,WIDE2*:`xF*r6`>/'"7-}|!_&''m|!ww"!|3 
>
>
> Port(inet-text):2012-11-21T22:15:39.221 
> TEXT:AE0TB-5>APOT21,K0HAM-9*,WIDE1*,N0CXX-5*,WIDE2*:!4219.18N/09235.72W#PHG52606/Reinbeck 
> Digi _ae0tb at arrl.net_ <mailto:ae0tb at arrl.net>
>
> Port(inet-text):2012-11-21T22:21:15.442 
> TEXT:W0MG-5>APOT21,K0HAM-9*,WIDE1*,N0CXX-5*,WIDE2*:!4230.82N/09218.13WoWaterloo, 
> Ia _aprs at w0mg.net_ <mailto:aprs at w0mg.net>
>
>
> Unfortunately I can only receive packets directly from K0HAM-9 about 
> 70% of the time so I can't independently confirm these.
>
> -David, KC0ALC
>
>
> --*
> David Peterson*
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Ron Tonneson 
> <_ron.tonneson at gmail.com_ <mailto:ron.tonneson at gmail.com>> wrote:
> OK, thanks.  Before I gave Charlie the EPROM I tested it here in a 
> TNC-2 with simulated WX data from a serial port and it worked OK.  
> Looks like the WX connection to the TNC and the baud rate needs to 
> checked.
>
> Ron
>
>
> On 11/21/2012 16:06, David Peterson wrote:
> I have been monitoring APRS (RF) all day and have not seen any WX 
> packets from N0CXX, just the 146.745-C object, the N0CXX-5 digipeater 
> object and the UIDIGI beacon on it's regular schedule.
>
> The IAn-N path shouldn't impact anything, I-Gates will gate the 
> packets just like any other  (Just confirmed it)
> 2012-11-21 22:00:11 UTC: *_KC0ALC_* 
> <http://aprs.fi/?c=raw&limit=&call=KC0ALC>>APWW10,IA2-1,qAR,_KD0PCP_ 
> <http://aprs.fi/?c=raw&limit=&call=KD0PCP>:@220002h/9<j%7?E{- sTAPRS-IS for Win32, 
> _kc0alc at arrl.net_ <mailto:kc0alc at arrl.net> WLNK-1
> 2012-11-21 22:00:18 UTC: *_KC0ALC_* 
> <http://aprs.fi/?c=raw&limit=&call=KC0ALC>>APWW10,IA2-1,qAR,_KD0PCP_ 
> <http://aprs.fi/?c=raw&limit=&call=KD0PCP>::WLNK-1   :ack5625
>
>
> -David, KC0ALC
>
> --*
> David Peterson*
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Ron Tonneson 
> <_ron.tonneson at gmail.com_ <mailto:ron.tonneson at gmail.com>> wrote:
> Posting from the CRAPRS mailing list:
> I have been working with Charlie to get WX data on the 112 digi.  In 
> the process we also changed the call to N0CXX-5.  The new EPROM is now 
> in and the digi appears to be OK but I am not seeing any WX data on 
> APRSIS.  There could be a number of reasons for this.
>
> I have the WX path set to IA2-2 rather than WIDE2-1.  This is to keep 
> the packets local on RF.  It could be that none of the Igate's used, 
> primarily KD0PCP, are not putting the IA path on the APRSIS system. 
>  The other possibility is that the TNC is just not getting the data 
> from the WX properly.  The WX frame should be coming our every 444 
> seconds.
>
> I cannot hear it direct here in Williamsburg, could someone local 
> capture some data on RF direct to see what it is sending?
>
> On another subject K0HAM-9 at Chelsea went down a couple of days ago 
> and I just noticed it today.  I plan a trip over there as soon as I 
> hear from the site owner as to the combination to get in.
>
> Ron - K0QVF
>
> _______________________________________________
> CRAPRS mailing list_
> __CRAPRS at rf.org_ <mailto:CRAPRS at rf.org>_
> __https://rf.org/mailman/listinfo/craprs_
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CRAPRS mailing list
> CRAPRS at rf.org
> https://rf.org/mailman/listinfo/craprs
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CRAPRS mailing list
> CRAPRS at rf.org
> https://rf.org/mailman/listinfo/craprs

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://rf.org/pipermail/craprs/attachments/20121121/67b7e17d/attachment.html>


More information about the CRAPRS mailing list