No subject


Tue Jul 28 09:57:54 CDT 2009


dependent upon internet connectivity.  Most of their records, and procedural

information is via internet.  A decent speed ad-hoc connection must be in o=
ur

emergency 'bag of tricks.'  There have been several ideas floated at local =
ARES

discussions.  The hangup is:  there are so many ways to get into the intern=
et,

it is unknown which one will actually be able to connect during an emergenc=
y.

=20


> aprs is entirely unnumbered and unconnected, and that's what makes it=20
> work well. it also seems like that would lend itself to useful, but=20
> slow data communications over a fairly wide area.
>=20

=20

Key work here is slow.  Again, served agencies require better than dial up =
for

their service needs.


> anyone have any info on using digis to connect up to tncs far and=20
> wide, or passing files on 144.390?
>=20
> -jerry


Wyoming has an excellent APRS system of interconnected digis.  They only ha=
ve about

13 digis for the whole state.  Before a trip out that way, I looked up the =
digis and

igates in Wyoming.  Seeing on a handful, I though coverage would be bad or

nonexistent.=20=20

=20

For the trip out there, thinking things would be very

sparse,  I bumped up my packet rate, and put a linear on the output of the =
HT.  I was

still lulled into thinking I wasn't being detected, because I couldn't hear=
 my signal being

digipeated.

=20

Upon return, I found out the Wyoming guys have their act together.  The dig=
is they do have are all located up pretty high, >10,000 feet in many cases.=
  Their footprint is

massive.  Because of this, the don't run them as digipeaters, but as remote=
 receivers=20

and local TNCs=20

for a central (actually two) igate.  This cuts down on the channel traffic,=
 and the=20

central igate does packet filtering before dropping the packets into the in=
ternet.  They

use 440 and 1296 as links.  The result is tremendous coverage for almost th=
e entire state,

with very low collision rates and sparse digis.  So I was applying my norma=
l 'flat land'

Iowa concepts of how APRS works to Wyoming.  I was quite wrong.

_________________________________________________________________
Get back to school stuff for them and cashback for you.
http://www.bing.com/cashback?form=3DMSHYCB&publ=3DWLHMTAG&crea=3DTEXT_MSHYC=
B_BackToSchool_Cashback_BTSCashback_1x1=

--_d0f90d74-c5a3-4438-aaf1-eed8dddd7300_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

<html>
<head>
<DEFANGED_style=20
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Verdana
}
></DEFANGED_style>
</head>
<body class=3D'hmmessage'>
Jerry, I've been thinking about this since you sent it, and came up with so=
me ideas.<BR>
&nbsp;<BR>
<BR>&nbsp;<BR>
&gt; Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 17:03:37 -0500<BR>&gt; To: craprs at rf.org<BR>&gt;=
 From: info at n-connect.net<BR>&gt; Subject: [CRAPRS] aprs backbone for emerg=
ency communications<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; Posting from the CRAPRS mailing list:<=
BR>&gt; is it possible to use the large number of aprs high level digipeate=
rs <BR>&gt; as ax.25 digipeaters? <BR>
&nbsp;<BR>
Yes, but if they are all on the same channel, it will just clog up the chan=
nel with<BR>
collisions, or grind it to a halt because of overloading.<BR>
&nbsp;<BR>
&nbsp;<BR>
&nbsp;<BR>
&gt;1200 baud is slow, and my past experiences <BR>&gt; using it to transfe=
r files (back in the early 90s, for storm chasing) <BR>&gt; used to yield a=
 throughput of 600-900 bps when transferring files. <BR>&gt; and then even =
worse at 150-300bps when using a digipeater in the <BR>&gt; middle. I know =
channel congestion would be a huge problem trying to <BR>&gt; use aprs digi=
s, and it would be slow as heck, but in an emergency, <BR>&gt; you take wha=
t you can get.<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; you wouldn't surf the internet with it, and=
 would not even attempt to <BR>&gt; transfer even graphical weather map fil=
es, but i envision a scenario <BR>&gt; where it would be desirable to be ab=
le to send simple text traffic <BR>&gt; that would be too hard to relay ove=
r the air with voice comms <BR>&gt; reliably. for example, (from a year ago=
) a list of houses and names <BR>&gt; of those holding out and staying behi=
nd after a a flood evacuation....<BR>&gt; <BR>
&nbsp;<BR>


More information about the CRAPRS mailing list